5.+E-Evaluation

Evaluation Plan Jennifer Selby

Type of Evaluation This training will be evaluated in two ways. It will be evaluated by a survey that will be taken by the teachers participating in the training. It will also be evaluated by observation.

Evaluator The survey will be issued by the two teachers that trained the other teachers. They will also analyze the information. They will deliver their findings to the administration (principal and assistant superintendant). The observations will be carried out by the principal and the assistant superintendant. The survey and information about what the administration are looking for are at the end of this document.

Length of evaluation The survey will give back immediate results. The trainers can administer the survey directly following the training. The observations will require more time. Once the teachers and curriculum director have put together documents stating what needs to be used to teach the curriculum of the district, the teachers will need time to implement what they have learned. The teachers will be given approximately 6 weeks to apply what they have learned before they will be evaluated. Once the six weeks is over, the administrators will begin to set up times for observation. The terms of what they will be looking for is discussed later.

Survey-This survey will be used to determine whether or not the teachers felt this training was successful. IT will also determine whether or not they feel more prepared and ready to teach the series.

Rate this training on a scale of 1 to 5.

State one thing you liked best about the training today.

What would you have changed about this training?

What was the most important thing you learned from the training today?

Do you feel more comfortable with the reading series? Are you ready to use it in your classroom?

What do you feel that you still need more information about in order to be successful with the program?

3=agree 2=neutral 1=disagree

1. This course was relevant to what I do on the job. 2. I was able to master the objectives. 3. The training gave me practical information. _ 4. The mini-lessons were useful. 5. We had time to complete all training activities. _ 6. The course was well organized.

Additional Comments:

a. Proof that the teacher has knowledge of all of the materials needed to teach the district’s curriculum. b. Is the teacher utilizing the proper components to teach the curriculum? c. Are the students successful in the classroom? d. Is all of the material being covered?
 * Observation-**This will let the trainers know if the teachers took the information and were able to apply it to their jobs. This would be evaluated by an administrator (principal or superintendant). They would be looking for the following things:

Rubric: Implementing Houghton Mifflin || **  3  ** ||  **  2  ** ||  **  1  ** || The teacher was well prepared for the lesson. || Teacher was semi-prepared and planning was obviously lacking. || Teacher was not prepared. No planning was evident. || Teacher showed mastery of knowledge of each component of the series. || Teacher showed some knowledge of each component of the series. || Teacher showed little to no knowledge of each component of the series. || All components were used properly. || Some components were used properly. Or All components were used but some were not used properly. || Components were not used. Or Some components were used but were not used properly. || All to Most Students were successful in meeting the objectives of the lesson. || Some students were successful in meeting the objectives of the lesson. || Little to No students were successful in meeting the objectives of the lesson. ||
 * Preparation ** ||
 * Preparation ** ||
 * Knowledge of components ** ||
 * Knowledge of components ** ||
 * Use of components ** ||
 * Use of components ** ||
 * Student Success ** ||
 * Student Success ** ||